Thanks
Published on October 17, 2004 By greywar In Blogging
My last few articles have been done in 14pt New Time Roman with double line spacing

            My last few articles have been done in 14pt New Time Roman with double line spacing. 90% percent of the time they look fine on my computer but every once in a while I see them with the lines all bunched up. Do they look right to those of you out there who read them? I am still trying to nail down what format JU likes best. Thanks.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 17, 2004
Not only do these look right to me, the "purpling" of the used links in the right column of your blogsite has disappeared as well.
I suppose it's futile to point out the fickle ways of JU... At one point last night, after I had updated my links, I couldn't update again, until I had closed all my browser windows and opened JU again.

As far as if it looks ok... It's fine. Formatting isn't my #1 concern about your blog.
on Oct 17, 2004

I have never figured out the purple link thing either....

Formatting isn't my #1 concern about your blog.

Well I certainly can't limp by with just content!

on Oct 17, 2004
They all look fine to me but I've noticed that your page, more often than any other, appears odd at times. Different colored links, bunched up text, that sort of thing... I just reload and it's usually good to go.
on Oct 17, 2004
At one point last night, after I had updated my links, I couldn't update again, until I had closed all my browser windows and opened JU again.


That happens sometimes. I've found it happens more often if you have multiple JU windows open. I close all but one, wait a minute or so, and reload. That usually fixes it. If that doesn't work, I log out and log back in. Don't know the why...
on Oct 17, 2004
Looks fine, big, but fine.
on Oct 17, 2004
I'm in agreement with NBS: big and fine. Just like we likes 'em.
on Oct 17, 2004
I'm in agreement with NBS: big and fine. Just like we likes 'em


Geeze, is everything homoerotic with you guys?

Can you tell I've been in TRADOC for a year?
on Oct 17, 2004

Geeze, is everything homoerotic with you guys?

Who said he was talking about men? Freudian much?

on Oct 17, 2004
Please go here: Link

And why is that necessarily a gay thing? I actually intended it as a BBW reference, and attributed it to both NBS and myself (mostly so he and his spouse would know that I didn't really mean it).

edit: Ah, Sarnath'd.
on Oct 17, 2004
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Knew I'd get a rise out of both of you!
on Oct 17, 2004

Knew I'd get a rise out of both of you!

speaking of homo-eroticism...

on Oct 17, 2004
Knew I'd get a rise out of both of you!

speaking of homo-eroticism...


BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Didn't take you long to catch that... now, where is your mind???
on Oct 17, 2004

now, where is your mind???

If I knew that I would hunt it down and give a stern talking-to.

on Oct 17, 2004
Every one of the articles that I've seen has been mangled; it looks like 14-point TR type, single-spaced in 10-point -high lines.
(I'm using FireFox 0.9.3.)
on Oct 17, 2004

Every one of the articles that I've seen has been mangled;

Does it stay that way when you hit the reload button?

2 Pages1 2