Yes, let us strive for a greater understanding of this...
Published on May 6, 2004 By greywar In Politics

This will be my now standard once a week non post. Sometimes I just can't hold back.

Since the governor of Zamfara State, Alhaji Ahmed Sani, introduced a draconian version of sharia in 1999, 11 of Nigeria’s 36 states have followed suit. Five women have been sentenced to death by stoning for adultery, though no punishment has yet been carried out. Thieves have had their hands amputated by court order. One man had his eye removed after accidentally blinding a friend (he could have escaped this by paying 60 camels, but the injured party wasn’t interested in the camels).

Under these sharia dictates, women are harshly subjugated. In northern Nigeria, they have been forbidden to rent houses and barred from riding motorbikes or traveling in the same vehicles as men. Taxi drivers have been caned for carrying female passengers. Zamfara requires all high-school girls to wear a hijab and bars them from wearing skirts and other “Western” forms of dress. State officials have advocated public flogging of those violating an “Islamic” dress code. Prostitution charges have been leveled at women merely for the crime of being unmarried after the age of 13. Judges in Bauchi State have told women to get married immediately or be sent to prison. One judge ordered four of them to pick out husbands from among the men in the court. Women are at a particular disadvantage in these criminal prosecutions since their testimony usually counts for only half that of a man.

Non-Muslims, usually Christians, have become second-class citizens. Their taxes pay for Islamic preachers, while hundreds of churches have been closed by government order. Last week, Sani announced that all “unauthorized” places of worship in Zamfara State would be demolished. Those who exercise their right under the Nigerian constitution to change their religion from Islam are threatened with death, a punishment for apostasy under sharia law. The Catholic and Anglican churches have had to set up protected centers for converts.

This spread of radical Islam has also led to riots, mob attacks, and vigilantes, producing the largest death toll in Nigeria since the civil war over Biafra in the 1960s. Over 10,000 people have died in the last four years in sharia-related violence — perhaps over 1,000 in the central states this year alone.

Recent months have seen the emergence of more organized militias. In early January, in Yobe State, there was an uprising by a group calling itself the “Taliban,” led by a “Mullah Omar,” and demanding an Islamic state. It took several hundred troops two weeks to put it down.

Foreign groups have been aiding the institutionalization of Islamic law. Saudi, Sudanese, Syrian, and Palestinian representatives appeared with Governor Sani in the days before he announced his plans for sharia. The Jigawa State government has sent Islamic judges for training in Malaysia and Sudan. The government of Katsina State has sent a delegation to Sudan to study its laws. Other states have been offered assistance from some these same countries as well as from Iran and Libya.

In January, the Saudi religious and cultural attaché in Nigeria, Sheik Abdul-Aziz, said that his government had been monitoring the implementation of sharia in Nigeria and noted the results “with delight.”

Courtesy LGF

 

Tell me again why we are the evil ones here?

 


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on May 06, 2004
Whoa…what an article…what evil is highlighted here. How can we respond to such an exposure of the degradation of the real purpose of religion…to bring us to the knowledge of God and His plan for our joy in living and caring for one another in this world?

Perhaps our response can be to join in with millions of Americans on this 2004 National Day of Prayer, May 6th. Its goal is to encourage believers to embrace the freedom to express their faith openly without recrimination. We might be taking this right for granted but this article (greywar’s contribution) throws a strong spotlight on the many countries throughout the world that do not afford their citizens that same freedom but even by their religious beliefs deprive them of basic human rights. If we fail to take advantage of the religious freedom afforded us as citizens, we run the risk of losing it.

The inscription on the Liberty Bell is from Leviticus 25:10…”proclaim liberty throughout the land to all its inhabitants,” was proscribed by our Founding Fathers in 1752.

Let’s all join in prayer that our basic rights will never be taken away. Let freedom ring!
on May 06, 2004
I read an article, In The Beginning, written by Bruce Feiler in the Parade section of Sunday’s newpaper (Fargo Forum). You can read this interesting article online at parade.com. It covers the author’s visit to biblical sites in Iraq. It reveals some of the evil deeds of Saddam that devastated this land. The whole article is worth reading but I was especially caught by this one sentence:

“The pedestal that held Saddam’s statue has been filled with a woman holding a moon--a symbol of freedom.”
on May 06, 2004
Religion of peace it does not appear to be, but I do occasionally wish our American culture held to higher moral standards.
on May 07, 2004
i believe islam literally translates to 'submit' or 'submission' for whatever that's worth. the specific problem in this instance may seem to be the application of sharia (id like to think it is being applied incorrectly but im not sure thats the case), but the larger issue is, in my opinion, rooted in a chronic flaw in the human psyche, the primary symptom of which is blind adherence to dogma.
its not exclusive to any culture or spiritual philosophy and whats happening in sub-saharan africa is no more or less bizarre than what happened in waco, tx, at jim jones' last stand or during ceremonies involving handling of poisonous snakes in the appalachians. my present take on things is that in matters of faith, the problem isnt religious intolerance but far too much tolerance of religion and the religious.
on May 07, 2004
id like to think it is being applied incorrectly


Most Muslims outside of that area think it is. I'm certainly no expert, but from what I've read it seems like they're generally adopting Koranic punishments without also adopting Koranic safeguards and standards of evidence. For example, a conviction for adultery in Sharia requires at least four eyewitnesses to the act of penetration--obviously a standard that's practically never met--so people would very rarely have been stoned for it under a strict interpretation of Islamic law.

Religion of peace


It's not fair to blame religion exclusively for the problems of the culture. If you look at history, Islamic societies were typically more tolerant, advanced, and humane than Christian ones--so religion alone cannot be the key deciding factor in whether a society is a good place to live or not. The problems of these places go way beyond religion.
on May 07, 2004
This is my opinion on the matter of religion.

When one reads the texts of most religions, it's hard to blame the religion itself from the actions of it's followers. A lot of atrocities have been committed in the name of religions (with Christianity and Islam being the most prevalent examples) which could not legitimately be justified by what the texts teach. However, my belief is that religions were created by men to control the actions of other men by controlling their minds. Historically, the leaders of religions have interpreted (read warped) the texts to serve purposes that they believe were either good for the spread of that religion, good for their country, or good for themselves. Religions hold massive power over the masses. The leaders usually enjoy and benefit from that power. The masses often do not benefit. Such is the nature of altruism. The masses sacrifice, the leaders gain.

So in my mind, religions ARE to blame for many of our problems. Not because a specific text doesn't support the actions of the followers, but because the design and implementation of religion was and is by men who use it for their means.

I am sure the faithful will disagree.

VES
on May 07, 2004
Excellent article. greywar, and very timely.

One of the things that I find problematic about organized religions (pretty much across the board, not singling out Islam) is the seeming inabilty of moderates to stand up to extremists of the same relgion. History is full of examples. In Israel, the ultra-Orthodox have been known to throw stones at cars driven by other Jews that violate the Sabbath. Historically, the Catholic church has wrestled with disciplining its own militants. Church extremists in America rarely come under fire from more moderate members, who may in private confide their embarassment.

But back to Islam in Nigeria. I found this recent quote from the Nigerian Tribune "When it is a question of religion," declared a journalist , "men very easily show their animal nature. It is in this context that we are witnessing the efforts of Governor Ahmed Sani to impose the Sharia on the inhabitants of the region of Zamfara [ N.W. Nigeria ].In playing with the problem of sharia, Governor Sani is in the process, directly or indirectly, of preparing the country for a war of religion."

Greywar's point is well-taken.
on May 07, 2004
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that people, not religion, are the problem. In order to wage any type of atrocity, one needs to make an argument that it is morally justified. The vast majority of people base their morality on some sort of religious undergirding. Therefore, the vast majority of atrocities indeed have some twisted religious undergirding. If all of society was atheist, we'd be having atrocities justified in the name of Utilitarianism or the Categorical Imperative or whatever your favorite atheistic moral principle is.

(I'm an atheist btw)
on May 07, 2004

'Men never do evil so cheerfully or so well as when they do it out of religious conviction'


Blaise Pascal

on May 07, 2004
"'Men never do evil so cheerfully or so well as when they do it out of religious conviction'"

amen sistah



on May 07, 2004
In Darfur, Sudan, 860,000 human beings were forced out of their homes by Arab militants performing "ethnic cleansing" against Africans. These exiled people have no food or shelter in Africa. This is inspired by ethnicity which is yet another way hatred is expressed. These inhumane acts, in retrospect, reminds us that humanity as a whole needs to undergo a change in the way we think. By the way I like that quote Dharma
on May 07, 2004
If all of society was atheist, we'd be having atrocities justified in the name of Utilitarianism or the Categorical Imperative or whatever your favorite atheistic moral principle is.


You conjecture MAY be right, but I can't think of an instance in history where a newer reason / reality based philosophy has had a chance (on a national level) to determine this premise. And it also depends on how broad you definition of atrocity is. But personally, I think taking actions based on rationally assessing the reality of threat or use of force is more likely to avoid atrocities than those assessments based on mystical belief.

VES
on May 07, 2004
Kingbee,
You wrote: …the larger issue is…rooted in a chronic flaw in the human psyche, the primary symptom of which is blind adherence to dogma.

As a Christian, I call that chronic flaw the results of original sin, pride. Blind adherence to any law, authority or dogma is contrary to my understanding of what God expects of me. I believe I have received the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, who is given to me as a guide to discern what is morally proper in every circumstance of my life. The Holy Spirit is the megaphone of my conscience. Not only does the Spirit guide me. He empowers me to follow his guidance. (Much different that the advice given by gurus such as Dr. Phil or Oprah. They just advise but have no power to help me follow that advice.) In my opinion, we are never called to blindly follow anything. Hitler called for that kind of blindness. We are called to use our God-given abilities to discern what is good and proper. Then God gives us the power to follow our consciences.
on May 07, 2004
Vernmeister2u,
You wrote: So in my mind, religions ARE to blame for many of our problems.

Jesus would agree with you. During his time on earth he constantly railed against those “religious” leaders like the Scribes, Sadducees and Pharisees who used their power to enrich themselves and to put heavy burdens on the common people. Jesus condemned them outright and on many occasions. This is the wrongful use of religion.

In my opinion, true religion brings us closer in our knowledge of God, who does not wish to control us. We are not to be puppets on a string. He has given us free choice. As the Bible tells us in ROM 12:2 “Do not conform yourselves to this age but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and pleasing and perfect.”

We renew our minds by study of the mind of Christ, the mind that has tried to teach the world the way of love, loyalty, kindness, joy and peace.
on May 07, 2004
Oleteach,

I appreciate your response.

Jesus would agree with you.


However, I must point out a few things that I find self-evident that Jesus would not agree with.

I am my own end. I am not an end to others, including mystical, fictional super beings which I reject (along with the self-destructive and diminutive concept of altruism). My sense of life, my own life, gives me cause for morality, not some alleged higher being. Many christians will tell me that's impossible, yet somehow I manage to do it. While many of the ideas and morals I have thought through and accepted coincide with those of christianity (and many other religions), mine have an entirely different basis.

VES
2 Pages1 2