I don't get it Steve...
Published on January 11, 2007 By greywar In Gadgets & Electronics

     Just a follow-up to this post. Cisco had in fact been in negotiations with Apple for a long time over the iPhone name and was prepared to make them a deal so Apple could use it. Cisco was extremely surprised by Apple's unveiling of the phone when they hadn't closed the deal though. As I said earlier I think this will cost Apple a bunch of cash and will likely delay the launch of their phone unless they rename it or settle quickly.

     I really can't fathom the hubris behind this sort of decision making. I guess maybe Steve just thinks he should be able to do anything he wants now?

From Fox News via Estrogen Lass:

"Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO), the world's largest networking equipment maker, sued Apple in San Francisco federal court on Wednesday, claiming that Apple's iPhone violates its trademark.

Cisco is asking the court to forbid Apple from using the name "iPhone," which Cisco has held a trademark on since 2000 and used to brand a line of its own Internet-enabled phones that began shipping last spring and officially launched three weeks ago.

...

Cisco said the talks broke down just hours before Apple's chief executive, Steve Jobs, took to the stage Tuesday at the annual Macworld Conference and Expo to introduce the multimedia device.

"We certainly expected that since they had gone ahead and announced a product without receiving permission to use the brand, that meant that the negotiation was concluded," said Mark Chandler, Cisco senior vice president and general counsel."

 

 

I am baffled.

 

 

 

Site Meter
Comments
on Jan 11, 2007
It is ego.  They are on a roll, and feel like they can do anything.  The beat Apple in Court, and of course the iPod is a mega hit.  So they got the money - and the balls - to thumb their nose at Cisco.  Unfortunately for Apple Computers, Cisco is not Apple records, and still bigger than Apple.
on Jan 11, 2007
My understanding is that this has something to do with the fact that Cisco only holds the trademark in the US and so Apple can legally use iPhone in the rest of the world. I'm guessing there is also some sort of branding law that will help Apple (based on iPod, iTunes, iLife), but I honestly don't know about that.

Either way, it seems like a bizarre way to negotiate.
on Jan 11, 2007

Either way, it seems like a bizarre way to negotiate.

I agree... it just doesn't seem to make good business sense.

on Jan 11, 2007
Looks like they took a page from Microsoft and did what they wanted to and figured the details would sort themselves out. Reguardless if they get to use the name or not, it is loads of free press for their new gizmo. The end consumer really isn't going to care about the name all that much.
on Jan 11, 2007
Looks like they took a page from Microsoft


Steve Jobs is going to get you for that statement.   
on Jan 11, 2007
Doesn't Bill Gates own the rights to doing business that way? I hope Steve Jobs bought a license...