Kids's Only AOL next?
Published on June 19, 2005 By greywar In Internet

     Credit : Slashdot

Update : I ama retard. Link to the article about Yahoo is here and also fixed in the article's main body.

     Way back in Jun 04 I wrote a bit about AOL's sketchy practice of marketing their Kid's Only Rooms as "a safe environment on the Net" all the while knowing that it was like putting up a giant sign saying "All the little kiddies are right here!" for the net pedophiles. AOL still reaps huge profit from unsavvy parents this way but finally someone else has shed a bit of light on this practice by another Net business concern : Yahoo.

     See the deal was that on Yahoo! Chat you could make a room with any sort of name you wanted under any of their heading like "education" or "School". Pedophiles moved in ffast and they quickly became a swap meet for porn and a place to "groom" kids for potential meets.

     Yahoo of course had no interest in shutting this down because Yahoo Chat is a massive ad revenue generator. The more people using more of it's rooms the more money it made. This practice was recently exposed causing yahoo to disallow the practice of creating your own rooms anywhere is Yahoo Chat. Maybe someone at a major new station will wake up and take a look at AOL too?

     The bottom line is that we as a society insist on ID only to verify that you are over a certain age and have no mechanism for verifying that a Net user is under a certain age. This ensures that sites which cater to children are merely concentrators for adults posing as children for sexual purposes. Without a "Minor ID" card or something similar there are no safe places for kids on the net. Anywhere.

 

Site Meter
Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 20, 2005
in the interest of fairness Yahoo has discontinued this practice since it was revealed in the light of day.


In all fairness, why did they wait until it was revealed?
After all the previous news articles covering chatrooms throughout the yrs, they either knew or should have known.

If I were to set up for chat rooms and announced they would be "a safe environment on the net", I'd make damn sure they were.
on Jun 21, 2005

In all fairness, why did they wait until it was revealed?

Because they were making money without incurring a negative image until then.

on Jun 21, 2005
BUSH THE MERCILESS IS PUSHING 'NUMBER OF THE BEAST' ID CARDS" blogs.


That's the first thought I had. Can you imagine the public reaction to ID cards for Children? Not jsut the far-rights fear of the #, but practical fears. How much info would be on them? Would it pose a threat to kids? (Pedophiles could hack into the database and "shop" for what they wanted-then track down the child in real life)

Sorry to be so paranoid, but these days, people really are out to get you......
on Jun 21, 2005
Sorry to be so paranoid, but these days, people really are out to get you.


I agree with you that ID cards would probably lead to more children being exposed to predators, and on the other hand, I think it would help. But to say the IDs are Bush's number of the beast cards is just plain silly. In order to be the number of the beast, it would have to be mandatory for everyone in the world to get it. Adults as well as kids. And while we already have social security numbers, Bush had nothing to do with. If I was worried about this type of thing, social security would be the one I would worry about. Newborn children can't even leave the hospital without a ss number.
on Jun 21, 2005
So... I'm thinking you won't get any kind of verifiable ID for kids any time soon, unless we sensible people oppress a bit more. In the meantime we'll either take people's words for it, or insist on credit card numbers which just lets people steal our identities


--Well, ironically, there are procedures,not requiered, to implant chips to a child or pet, to track them...it costs a bloody fortune but it is able to track them anywhere to my knowledge....
on Jun 22, 2005

--Well, ironically, there are procedures,not requiered, to implant chips to a child or pet, to track them...it costs a bloody fortune but it is able to track them anywhere to my knowledge....

     True but all the same cons go with them. My point here is not that we need kids ID cards but rather that allowing young kids unsupervised Net access is akin to letting them go downtown unsupervised.

on Jun 22, 2005
True but all the same cons go with them. My point here is not that we need kids ID cards but rather that allowing young kids unsupervised Net access is akin to letting them go downtown unsupervised.


Absolutely!
on Oct 21, 2005
How about social security numbers as a way of verifying age? SSN should be able to verify the age of someone, even though it may take a while. After all, when you apply for a number you provide certain information, like a birth date, right? Ive had mine for so long I don't remember what I needed to do, but I remember that I was underage, so I know you don't have to be an adult to get one.
on Nov 07, 2005
I surfed on here from blogexplosion.... very interesting writings- all of them.
I'll be back.
on Nov 07, 2005
SHESH Greywar...don't you ever have any GOOD NEWS???

on Nov 07, 2005
How about social security numbers as a way of verifying age?


The rampant use of SSNs for other then the original intended purpose is what helped ID theft pretty much the #1 crime in America.

Besides, you really want kids giving out their SSNs to sites that pander to pedophiles?
2 Pages1 2