<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Word from the Geekside Comments - Brought to you by JoeUser</title><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/rss/comments</link><copyright>© 2006 - 2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><description /><language>en-us</language><pubDate>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDate><lastBuildDate>2008-07-09T10:36:08</lastBuildDate><docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs><generator>Stardock Rss Generator v1.0, Andrew Powell</generator><managingEditor>info@stardock.com</managingEditor><webMaster>apowell@stardock.com</webMaster><item><author>Island Dog</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</comments><description><![CDATA[Great article.<br>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Island Dog on A "Windfall Tax" on Oil Would Be a Disaster</title></item><item><author>Texas  Wahine</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</comments><description><![CDATA[I read an article on MSNBC a couple weeks ago about how the price of gas is affecting middle class families.<br/><br/>They are taking shorter vacations and/or staying in the US for vacations.  Not cutting out vacations.  Nope.  Just making them a day or two shorter.  <br/><br/>Very informative article.  Let's see if I can pop your Karma cherry.  Haha.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Texas  Wahine on A "Windfall Tax" on Oil Would Be a Disaster</title></item><item><author>foreverserenity</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you&nbsp; - double ditto!&nbsp; Great article, well-explained (having recently discovered why it would hurt us myself) but you put it in terms that are very clearly understood!</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>foreverserenity on A "Windfall Tax" on Oil Would Be a Disaster</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!&nbsp; Great example, that most should be able to understand.&nbsp; Sadly, most will not get it.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/310607</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on A "Windfall Tax" on Oil Would Be a Disaster</title></item><item><author>cscoles</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/141581</comments><description><![CDATA[Interestingly, this experiment was condemned as unethical. Afterwards, the people realized what they <I>would</I> have done. But, I think everyone should have to go through this experiment, just so people are aware.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/141581</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/141581</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>cscoles on Would You Shock A Stranger to Death If I Said So? Probably.</title></item><item><author>ParaTed2k</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>Merry Christmas Graywar!!!</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Where are you?</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>ParaTed2k on Tunnel Terror Threat to Ft. Huachuca? Not So Much.</title></item><item><author>COL Gene</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> There is no doubt that blame for the current mortgage problems can be properly placed at the door step of both the consumer and companies trying to make a profit. The issue is should something be done to moderate the impact in the overall economy?<BR>
<BR>
I believe we need to first make sure that all mortgages in the future clearly state the worst case possibility.  We need to do a lot more to make sure people understand the terms of their borrowing. <BR>
<BR>
As to the current problem we can say too bad to those people that did not pay attention or acted inappropriately- they can just suffer the consequences.  The problem is that there are so many such problem mortgages that that may spill over into the overall economy and impact those of us that have not caused the problem. The more prudent action given the enormity of the problem might be to provide funding to refinance existing mortgages that have gone into default or are about to go into default with fixed rate loans at reasonable rates. That would help millions keep their homes and be more able to pay the loans forward. To finance this conversion we may need to ask both the financial institutions and taxpayers to help fund these mortgage conversions. <BR>
<BR>
<B>If we take too hard a line we may shoot ourselves in the foot if this problem were to trigger a much broader recession.</B></font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>COL Gene on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Adventure-Dude</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">However, making statements about the "overall economy" depersonalizes the problem. "If it doesn't make an impact on my life, it's not a problem" is an awfully selfish attitude to have. Do you care at all that children are going hungry and families are being torn apart over this non-catastrophe that doesn't affect you? If not, that is exactly what is wrong with this society. People are supposed to care about each other and help each other, not sneer when someone else screws up.</div><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">The discussion is specifically about the government and personal responsibility and nothing to do with whether or not it impacts me directly. As a matter of fact, as a trucker, a part of my own business does depend upon the housing and construction market, but that's irrelevant to this discussion.</div><br/><br/>This does impact me directly.  Because of the subprime lending it allowed for inflated housing prices in my area.  By allowing people to buy houses they had NO business buying in the first place forced pricing to go up (yes basic economics).  Sure I could have joined the subprime lending fad but why?  As LW said it is only driven by greed and makes little sense on paper.  It's called a high risk loan for a REASON!  <br/><br/>Caelia, how about those like me who can't afford a house because of this problematic lending?  This subprime lending also aided in the drastic increase in rent as well.  How come I don't hear any hollerin for us?  The way I see it the subprime lending was an unjustified inflation and it is now beginning to normalize.  Yeah it sucks for those who gambled and are losing alot of money and children that are effected.  Hopefully they learn a valuable lesson from this as well.  <br/><br/>BTW, I haven't seen ANY reports saying that the Soup Kitchens are being flooded as a result of this fluctuation of 'hungry children.'  And if this tears families apart then I'm sorry that just suggests that there may not have been much in that marriage in the first place (although divorce is already above 50%).  I don't see the homeless shelters beyond max capacity.  <br/><br/>JMO]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Adventure-Dude on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>MasonM</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">My point was that I see a lot of callous comments about how other people's problems don't matter as long as they don't infringe on our own happiness. I'm not saying that the government should be a charity. Rather, I'm saying that the only reason these problems exist is because people have an attitude that they shouldn't care about others. </div><br/><br/>Ummm, no. <br/><br/>People are making comments on whether or not the government should be bailing these people out of their own mistakes. You seem to have some problem making that connection.<br/><br/>The only reason these problems exist is because of people stupidly making very poor choices and getting themselves in over their heads. How does other people's attitudes about it have any bearing at all on the choices these people made?<br/><br/>It has nothing to do with being callous and everything to do with how the government spends tax dollars, and whether or not the government should be in the business of bailing people out when they make very poor personal choices.<br/><br/>One can have empathy for these people's plight and still not believe it's the government's responsibility to pat them on the head and tell them that Uncle Sam understands they are stupid and will bail them out from their own stupid choices.<br/><br/>That's what charities are for.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>MasonM on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>MasonM</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">However, making statements about the "overall economy" depersonalizes the problem. "If it doesn't make an impact on my life, it's not a problem" is an awfully selfish attitude to have. Do you care at all that children are going hungry and families are being torn apart over this non-catastrophe that doesn't affect you? If not, that is exactly what is wrong with this society. People are supposed to care about each other and help each other, not sneer when someone else screws up.</div><br/><br/>The discussion is specifically about the government and personal responsibility and nothing to do with whether or not it impacts me directly. As a matter of fact, as a trucker, a part of my own business does depend upon the housing and construction market, but that's irrelevant to this discussion.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>MasonM on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Adventure-Dude</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[High risk has high gain and harsh consequences as it's results.  If we start helping the people who lost tons of money on this then where does it stop?  <br/><br/>Stock market investments?  money mismanagement?  <br/><br/>As MM said this is an issue of Personal Responsibility.  Clearly something missing in the teaching to children but that's another story.<br/><br/>great article!<br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Adventure-Dude on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<P><TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text">There's no more George from a "It's a Wonderful Life." </TD></TR></TABLE> </P>
<P>Interesting comment (and I agree), in that I was just thinking recently that there are no more S&amp;Ls.&nbsp; Has anyone seen one?&nbsp; They are all mega banks now.&nbsp; I prefer small banks, but every time I move to one, they are gobbled up by BOEB (Big Old Expensive Bank).</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>stevendedalus</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[There's no more George from a "It's a Wonderful Life." ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>stevendedalus on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<P><TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text">The brighter side of this is your taxes will decrease *shrugs*</TD></TR></TABLE> </P>
<P>IN a pigs eye!&nbsp; Not in my area at least.&nbsp; I was in a meeting with the head IT guy of the county.&nbsp; He lived in it as well.&nbsp; And did not like the fact that the mortgage assessment program had only one direction. UP.&nbsp; So I do not expect to see any tax relief from this band of blood suckers.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>kingbee</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[only once was i told i'd have to cut my hair by an employer.  i was offered a front office position fraught with opportunity.  i went along with the program and when recruited elsewhere some years later, i was still fairly presentable so it wasn't an issue.  less than a year later, i began freelancing and decided not to implement any sorta dress code.  none of my clients seemed to have a problem with my hair but one did strongly suggest i wear shoes to all future meetings we took at studio offices since my being barefoot might lead some there to mistakenly conclude i was one of the producers.  <br/><br/>altho i don't actually do any hiring, on occasion i'm involved in selecting vendors/consultants as well as recommending purchases.   it's rare but there have been times when each candidate is equally well-qualified.  rather than flipping a coin, having em all draw straws or solicting a payoff, i choose the one with the longest hair. it may seem to offer females an advantage but hey--my hair hangs more than halfway down my back so it works for me.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>kingbee on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Xythe</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> Well in any event, homes will now be cheaper, good for me:) <BR>
Unfortunately, the value of your home will decrease as well. The brighter side of this is your taxes will decrease *shrugs*</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Xythe on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Sturgee</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> I sit at my computer tonight....after many, many glasses of wine.  I am licensed to sell real estate in the state in which I live.  I am very familiar with the current situation.  In fact, I bought my one-bedroom condo at the height of the boom.  Despite paying extra on my mortgage, I am currently upside-down in my property, due to the turn in the market.  Should somebody come "rescue" me?  No.  I knew what I was getting into.  In fact, because I knew what I was getting into, I did pay extra on my payments, and am not as far behind as I "should" be.  I'll gut it out for a little while longer, try to stash some extra cash away, and look to buy a bigger home while the market is down... probably sometime next year.<BR>
<BR>
I have little sympathy for those who didn't do their homework.  Did I have a lender or real estate agent who explained to me all the details of "interest only", "reverse mortgage", or "adjustable" mortgages when I bought my house?  NO!  I spent a whopping $17 for a book called "Mortgages for Dummies", and began my education of the financial ramifications of home-ownership.  I was about to sing my name to over a quarter of a million dollars of debt, and I needed to understand what I was getting into.  If anybody didn't take that precaution, then woe is them.  Yeah...the whole market may take a hit.... I know I've lost tens of thousands of dollars of equity in my property, and will have to wait quite a while to refinance or sell.  But, the market is doing what it does best.....adjusting.  Those who were not supposed to be home-owners in the first place will find that the "get a home quick" schemes just didn't work for them.  Does it suck for them?  Yes it does!  Do I sympathize for them?  Yes, I do.  But that doesn't mean the whole system should absorb their bad decisions......</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Sturgee on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Sturgee</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> I have a weird take on this I guess.  I worked in an office where the IT guys were just part of the team.  I had a really good friend, who was a Computer Science guy (BS in CS), and we worked side-by-side on a training team teaching analysts how to use a data visualization tool.  He is a true CS genius type (writes PERL scripts for fun).  It was a chore to get him to wear a collared shirt and decent shoes (Vans were his shoe of choice).  I can tell you, without hesitation, that I would give almost anything to have him by my side to do data manipulation.  Having said that, he and I went round-and-round about appearance.  I know he's great at what he does, and respect his individualism.  BUT, I do understand the position of a non-tech person who would see him and think..."If he doesn't care enough about himself to look decent, how can I trust him to care about my data (or my business)"?.  <BR>
<BR>
If somebody has worked within an organization long enough to earn the latitude to have relaxed grooming standards, good on you.  But if you are going to an interview, and your appearance represents 90% of what a potential employer has to honestly "judge" you by, can you really blame them?  A beard...no problem...within reason.  Slightly long hair...also passable.  But...long hair, no suit, tennis shoes, wrinkled clothes....   At what point to you think..."If this guy doesn't give a sh*t enough to at least TRY at the interview.....how can I expect him to really give a crap about the work we are trying to do?"......   My compadre insisted that if people only judged him by how he looked, than f*^k them.  But I couldn't get him to understand that these people don't know him from Adam.  They don't know that he can write a PERL script to convert an HTML table to XML for data ingestion into visualization tools in 10 minutes.  All they know is that you show up to a meeting scheduled 2 weeks in advance, and you are wearing Vans.  I love the guy.....I've been trying to switch jobs to come work with me....because I KNOW his value....but that's because I worked with him for 18 months.   He can't expect somebody off the street to know his value intrinsically.<BR>
<BR>
Am I way off-base here?</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Sturgee on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Caeli Aria</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Should we stop Pre Fab housing because that will put some people out of work?  By your thinking we have to because we have to think of "all the buggy whip makers who have to feed their children".</div><br/><br/>You know, it's funny that you should mention pre-fab housing in particular, because my husband happens to build the high end custom homes that people spend millions of dollars on. Of course I think that pre-fab housing is a horrible idea. We're house snobs.<br/><br/>But in the interest of remaining objective, no I don't think we should stop pre-fab housing. It makes some housing cheap enough that it is possible for many people with lower incomes to get their families out of the inner city areas that are infested with drugs and prostitution. I think improving people's lives is a wonderful thing.<br/><br/>Obviously, the market does rule with things like buggy whips. My point was that I see a lot of callous comments about how other people's problems don't matter as long as they don't infringe on our own happiness. I'm not saying that the government should be a charity. Rather, I'm saying that the only reason these problems exist is because people have an attitude that they shouldn't care about others. If the buggy whip makers have others to help them feed their children while they learn a new skill set, their children won't have to go hungry. If everyone thought like most of the people who have posted here, they would live on the street and their children would have to turn to prostitution or stealing just to get dinner.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Caeli Aria on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<P><TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text">However, making statements about the "overall economy" depersonalizes the problem. "If it doesn't make an impact on my life, it's not a problem" is an awfully selfish attitude to have. Do you care at all that children are going hungry and families are being torn apart over this non-catastrophe that doesn't affect you? If not, that is exactly what is wrong with this society. People are supposed to care about each other and help each other, not sneer when someone else screws up.</TD></TR></TABLE> </P>
<P>That is a good motto for charities, but not for government.&nbsp; FOr it is that thinking that would have protected the buggy whip manufacturers from extinction long after the age of horse and buggy are gone. Should we stop Pre Fab housing because that will put some people out of work?&nbsp; By your thinking we have to because we have to think of "all the buggy whip makers who have to feed their children".</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Caeli Aria</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> "Nonsense. Home mortgages and home construction are just a small part of the overall economic picture. The economy may stumble a bit, but it would hardly be the catastrophe some are making it out to be."<BR>
<BR>
MasonM, maybe some of the people who are making it out to be a catastrophe work in these sectors. For example, my husband goes out every day and builds houses so we can feed our kids and pay our bills. For us, home construction is a huge part of the economic picture and every day that he does not have a house to build is a devastating day because it means that later in the week we will have to make a choice between A. eating, or B. paying our bills. He has been doing this for 10 years and has no other skills. I would call anyone having to make that choice on a regular basis a catastrophe. It's only fair to note that we blame no one for our inability to feed our family or his choice to drop out of high school and my choice to skip college, refuse to take food pantry resources from other people who can't feed their children, and agree wholeheartedly that no one should be forced to bear the burden of other people's mistakes.<BR>
<BR>
However, making statements about the "overall economy" depersonalizes the problem. "If it doesn't make an impact on my life, it's not a problem" is an awfully selfish attitude to have. Do you care at all that children are going hungry and families are being torn apart over this non-catastrophe that doesn't affect you? If not, that is exactly what is wrong with this society. People are supposed to care about each other and help each other, not sneer when someone else screws up.</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Caeli Aria on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>I spent half my youth trapsing from one Army Post to another (and the other half doing it on Naval Bases and Marine Camps).&nbsp; There was NO security on half those posts, and the other half were very cursory.&nbsp; So while I have never been to Ft. Huachuca, I can say that if they target a post, it will not be hard to hit it.</P>
<P>Navy Bases and Marine Camps are a bit differnt.&nbsp; At least security is visible, if not very effective.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Tunnel Terror Threat to Ft. Huachuca? Not So Much.</title></item><item><author>drdugan</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168766</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> <BR>
<BR>
Wow Greywar, what a thoughtful, reasoned piece.  You're an amazing author.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
You resort to a personal attack on an anonymous Internet user, calling the author a "lunatic", "moron", "insane", "delusional", "idiot", and "chump".  I assure you: the author is none of those, despite your strong and assertive claims in this dark corner of the Internet.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
It seems a bit pathetic really, that you are so incapable of arguing the merits of the author, that instead you lower yourself to attack the person and try and convince others (contrary to the complex and time-test moderation system on Slashdot) that the person must be "a lunatic".  It seems many people disagree with you.  Are all those moderator people on Slashdot crazy?  That author had five posts, all moderated to +5 on that thread.  The moderation was not a fluke.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Strangely, you provide 2 quotes from user "drDugan" out of context, not posting the text to which the author replied.   Beautiful slant.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
It is also puzzling how you came up with the text on this page.  It does not follow logically from anything in the story you reference or the quoted text.  It seems like an attempt at exaggeration.  I am curious where these beliefs come from.  Are they yours?  Do you think that someone else has them.  It seems bizarre.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
What sort of sheltered, fragile mental state must a person have where their reaction to an author that disagrees with them is the inescapable conclusion that the author must be insane?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Also, your article, and the direct linking to the profile and the assertion: "looong history of lunacy", is borderline defamation.   I wonder if you live in a jurisdiction that has civil litigation for libel.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168766</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168766</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>drdugan on Just Being a Geek Doesn't Mean You're Sane</title></item><item><author>CharlesCS</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote"><br/>What? Wow.<br/><br/>Are you not forgetting a zero? 1,500 doesn't sound that much to me. Can be easily paid off in a month or two if you have no other obligations, I'd guess.</div><br/><br/>This had more to do with being stupid and ignorant to just how much I would need my credit to be good when I was became a family man. I won't deny I was foolish to ignore my problems and not try hard enough to solve them, I put pleasure and entertainment before my responsibilities and now my family is paying the price for my lack of intelligence and common sense.<br/><br/>I have, since then, improved and now own a new car and am looking forward to buying a home. I am also preparing to go to school so that I can take advantage of the opportunities arising on my current job.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>CharlesCS on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Spc Nobody Special</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> Ha.<BR>
<BR>
I went running on Resevoir Hill when I was there last year, up past the picnic area. While I was going up the peak I ran into a family of what appeared to be illegal Pakistanis coming down from the hills, going the other way. I looked at them like they were crazy, they looked at me like I was crazy (I don't know why they would look at a guy wearing running clothes, going  up the side of a small mountain in the summer in Arizona like he was crazy), then we both just went on our way. Didn't report them, weren't exactly carrying satchel charges and AKs, and I figured if they had gotten into Mexico and  through the border (obviously, it's maybe fifteen miles away), then managed to get off post, (likely), then through the highway checkpoints, (possible), and were willing to make a go at a new life with what they had on their backs, they probably earned a go at it.<BR>
<BR>
Ummm....I had a point, what was it? Oh yeah, yes, security there definitely sucks. They don't even try, not that they would suceed anyways.</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168841</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Spc Nobody Special on Tunnel Terror Threat to Ft. Huachuca? Not So Much.</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>Phoenix, eh?&nbsp; I might be in the market in 4 years.&nbsp; </P>
<P>As to your question, I guess it really did not matter.&nbsp; Great going.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<P><TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text">Doesn't the law require the lenders to provide a clear payment schedule to the borrower over the life of the loan? At least an estimate of the future payments when the promotional period ends?<BR><BR>I think it does. Did they Actually provide that to those fool borrowers? <BR><BR>I really dont know if they did or not. If they didnt, then that was unethical(even if the law did not require it)and they should be punished for that even .</TD></TR></TABLE> </P>
<P>Yes to the first - on fixed rates, I dont know to the second, and on the third - I think that goes beyond ethics to criminal.  And like I said, if they broke the law, nail them!  I have no use for criminal lending practices, and I am sure there are some out there (and why we have laws to penalize them when they do break them).  But this is perhaps a small number of crimes, with a large portion of whines, and the whiners should not be given a Bail out of Debt free card.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>foreverserenity</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> "P.S. Does anyone think these questions would have been asked if I was a female or a minority with an unusual hairstyle?"<BR>
<BR>
Naw, they wouldn't have.  If they didn't want either, minority or female, they would have weeded those out already anyway.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>foreverserenity on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Big Fat Daddy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> What about the sailboat lessons sales,  is that kosher?</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Big Fat Daddy on JU Moderator Attention Requested</title></item><item><author>ThinkAloud</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">So you agreed to the terms.  Now YOU (the imaginary person we all talk about) live by them.</div><br/><br/>Doesn't the law require the lenders to provide a clear payment schedule to the borrower over the life of the loan? At least an estimate of the future payments when the promotional period ends?<br/><br/>I think it does. Did they Actually provide that to those fool borrowers? <br/><br/>I really dont know if they did or not. If they didnt, then that was unethical(even if the law did not require it)and they should be punished for that even .<br/><br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>ThinkAloud on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>ThinkAloud</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Bailing these people out with tax money </div><br/><br/>I never said bailing them out is the way to go. I said "even if there was no  bailout ..... we all suffer ..." i.e. bailout will make our suffering worse.<br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">Home mortgages and home construction are just a small part of the overall economic picture.</div><br/><br/>Not true at all. Home construction is a big part of the economy. If it wasn't the market would not be as nervous as it is rigth now. The Oil have its effect too and so is Car sales. These three sectors are major parts of the economy. <br/><br/><br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>ThinkAloud on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>ThinkAloud</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">I just didn't know that you and I shared such a fascist viewpoint.</div><br/><br/>I dont think you grasped what i meant. Here it is in a nut shell:<br/><br/>1- No bail outs, lenders should suffer the losses<br/>2- Restructure the mortgages such that the stupid homeowners can pay them. Their stupidity to be penalized by adding a fine to the original debt.<br/>3- The lenders must be penalized for their unethical actions and the system to be changed so that this doesn't happen again.<br/><br/>Clear enough?<br/><br/>No facism involved <img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="http://images.stardock.com/ju/T_JU/smiles/Smile.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle">. everyone must pay for their stupidity but the society should be protected from the effect of their actions. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>ThinkAloud on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Jythier</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[The borrower seems to think that the lender has the responsibility of approving the loan, and therefore, the lender has the responsibility of deciding whether or not the borrower can afford it.  Well, that's not the way life works.  It's the responsibility of the borrower to know if the borrower can afford a mortgage, and it's the responsibility of the lender to limit their risk.  Should a lot of mortgages have been denied?  Absolutely - both sides are at fault for that, though.  If you take a mortgage that doesn't have a fixed payment, how are you going to know if you can afford that later?  You don't even know what your payment is going to be.  We had the lowest interest rates, record lows, and you took an ARM!  As if interest rates were going to drop...]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Jythier on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Moderateman</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[The term "personal Responsibility" seems to have gone by the wayside.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Moderateman on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Spc Nobody Special</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text">We have a couple dress code rules- you have to be dressed, and you have to have something on your feet.  We also prefer that people bathe since stinky people are bad.  </TD></TR></TABLE><BR>
<BR>
Can I work for you people? I know nothing about computers, outside of survival level army powerpoint, but I can sew, knit, and cast metal, and still make good coffee. Plus I'm obviously willing to travel and live in crappy conditions for low pay. (go army)<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text">I am not saying I want to come to work in bike shorts and a “Fuck-you” shirt mind you. </TD></TR></TABLE><BR>
<BR>
Mental picture of Greywar in spandex bike shorts........snicker......oops, just threw up in my mouth....just a little bit.</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Spc Nobody Special on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Dr Guy</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<P><TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text"> They should be seeing their CEOs hauled before congress to be grilled longer and hotter than a big-bite at a 7-11, and even that would be nothing more than a start to the fun they should wind up experiencing. </TD></TR></TABLE> </P>
<P>Yea, make a bad situation worse.&nbsp; No thanks.&nbsp; GW said it. "If fraud...".&nbsp; If not, then tough!&nbsp; Those companies were providing a service and charging for it.&nbsp; When you loan is "packaged", the law states the original terms of the loan applies (I had to get nasty with Suntrust on that one). So you agreed to the terms.&nbsp; Now YOU (the imaginary person we all talk about) live by them.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Dr Guy on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>Zoomba</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>It also depends on the type of business and how the office is laid out.</P>
<P>At the finanical place you said there was nothing more than a glass wall separating the packet whackers from the management folks.&nbsp; Potential clients/customers that come in to meet with management are going to see the network guys on the other side of that glass wall.&nbsp; Chances are they're also going to be business folks who don't understand that in IT being the best groomed doesn't necessarily mean you're good at your job.&nbsp; If they look through that window and see a bunch of long haired hippy freaks, it could hurt the company's ability to attract clients.&nbsp; In that particular case, it doesn't matter that techs would likely never have direct contact with a customer, they're highly visible to the customers.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Then there's GoDaddy where you're likely to never be seen by an outsider while working there.&nbsp; It's a NOC, plain and simple.&nbsp; Cables, parts, screw drivers scattered everywhere.&nbsp; It didn't sound like a location where the company would be doing a lot of client-facing business.&nbsp; Or if they do, it's nowhere near the network guys.&nbsp; In that case, yeah, who cares what you look like so long as the work is done well?</P>
<P>Office environment is a big factor in what sort of appearance may be required.&nbsp; Chances are, from how you described the layout of the work areas at the financial place (desks, no dividers, wide open, watched by management) it would have been a bad fit even if they didn't ask you to cut your hair.&nbsp; The lack of technical questions on the job interview was a good indicator too.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Zoomba on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>JeremyG</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>I've been asked the same question, mostly from financial companies.</P>
<P>I'm 32 years old and have been a professional in IT for 11 years.&nbsp; I have always had long hair.&nbsp; IN the 90's I think it actually HELPED me get some jobs.&nbsp; it just put off the persona of "techie geek".&nbsp;&nbsp;Kind of like "Whoa, if that guy is willing to come in here all confident with long hair, he must know his stuff".</P>
<P>My hair is also neat.&nbsp; I dont wear it like a rock star.&nbsp;&nbsp; It's always trimmed up around the ears, and worn in a pony tail (except on occasional where a hairdresser convinces me to cut it just short enough that i cant pull it back)</P>
<P>In any event, I've usually passed on any job who requested that I cut my hair.&nbsp; It was never a matter of pride....more like "is this job worth me getting laid less?".&nbsp; But these days it's just the principal of the matter.&nbsp; I have an impressive resume, I'm intelligent and well-spoken, and my long hair is not eccentric and therefore should not be a determining factor in a job.&nbsp;&nbsp; Any company who considers it such probably has different values in their people than i would like an employer to have.</P>
<P>All of that being said.&nbsp; If i was out of work and couldn't pay the bills, i'd take the scissors out myself.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>JeremyG on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Zoomba</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>Taken care of.</P>
<P>And you hit the nail on the head as to why we won't be giving elites exile access.&nbsp; If we ever do pull in more moderators for JU, the selection process will be very rigorous.&nbsp; We have several access ranks between elite and avatar that are specifically meant for moderation purposes.&nbsp;</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Zoomba on JU Moderator Attention Requested</title></item><item><author>Leauki</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote"><br/>$1500 in debt was enough to screw the next 13 years of my life<br/></div><br/><br/>What? Wow.<br/><br/>Are you not forgetting a zero? 1,500 doesn't sound that much to me. Can be easily paid off in a month or two if you have no other obligations, I'd guess.<br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Leauki on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>lifehappens</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> Here is a thought. <BR>
<BR>
If they enact certain guidelines to prohibit sub-prime mortgages...what happens in 20 or 30 years?  Right now, we have a tax "patch" that is supposed to be voted on by Congress every year to compensate for the ass-backward alternative minimum tax.  It wasn't geared for inflation and now, we hope that the government does it's job.  Can you imagine the cluster that this will become in 30 years if the government takes charge?<BR>
<BR>
Yikes!</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>lifehappens on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>lifehappens</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> Exactly.  Bailing out the idiots means we are subverting natural selection....we will evolve into a nation of idiots who are only smart enough to have our hand held and our ass wiped while the government tells us how they will "take care of us".<BR>
<BR>
Financially supporting idiots means that there is no motivation to delay gratification and live within your means.<BR>
<BR>
I have scrimped and saved, penny pinched and tried to be as fiscally smart as possible (basically staying out of debt-no implication as to investment here...)  If I was a little more susceptible to the so-called great offers....I'd be in debt up to my eyeballs, with no house or cars. </font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>lifehappens on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>MasonM</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">If we allow them to freely practice their stupidity we all pay the price. Even if there was no bailouts, the foreclosures will have a ripple effect on the economy and we all suffer from that.</div><br/><br/>Nonsense. Home mortgages and home construction are just a small part of the overall economic picture. The economy may stumble a bit, but it would hardly be the catastrophe some are making it out to be. Oil prices are much more of a threat to our economy that are stupid lending practices by a certain banking sector.<br/><br/>Bailing these people out with tax money is the only way we would all "pay the price" for the stupidity of these people. It isn't the job of the government to do so and that's not what tax money is supposed to be spent upon. Rental property owners need to make a living too. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>MasonM on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>CharlesCS</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Table"><TR><TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text"> As a younger man I allowed myself to get way over my head in credit card debt. I lived beyond my means. I saved nothing. I have been late on payments and had default settlements of credit card balances.</TD></TR></TABLE><BR>
<BR>
Wow, for a moment there, I thought you were talking about me. As some here know, I screwed up my credit at the age of 18; got myself a few store cards and a credit card or 2 and never bother to pay for the items I bought. To this date, 13 years later, I am still paying the consequences of my stupidity and ignorance. While I never got a house or a new car loan, never had any major credit cards with enormous limits, $1500 in debt was enough to screw the next 13 years of my life. I since then have learned a great deal, and while I am not perfect when it comes to keeping up with my debt, I have improved this past year to the point of finally buying myself my first new car and working to clear my credit out completely so that I may start work on purchasing a home (while keeping an eye on current events) and stabilizing my rollercoaster of a lifestyle. My family has suffered enough from my stupidity and ignorance and its time I became a responsible citizen of this great nation.<BR>
<BR>
BTW, thru out all these years of being a screw-up, not once did I ever believe the Gov't owed me anything. I got what I deserved and never argued against it. During hard times I did receive some federal help such as food stamps and tax breaks, but I never lasted long since I never stopped looking for a better job that paid more. I like the idea of knowing what I have I worked hard and paid for with my own sweat and not that of my fellow Americans.</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>CharlesCS on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>little-whip</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> It would be nice if admins would gift a few elites with the ability to exile these cumchunks on sight.</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168749</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>little-whip on JU Moderator Attention Requested</title></item><item><author>CharlesCS</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</comments><description><![CDATA[<Font Face="Arial" Size="2" Color="000000"> While I can understand this whole "we have to save the economy to save ourselves" argument, maybe what we need to to allow this to happen in hopes that people will learn and avoid this from happening again. It's the "you live, you learn" concept. Sure I wouldn't want this country to become a disaster, but helping pay off our stupidity while allowing the mortgage companies to make the profits at the same time is basically telling people that it's OK to screw people out of their money and possessions cause the Gov't will protect you if something goes wrong that could affect the entire nation, a problem that was foreseen before the idea was implemented and was used as a back-up to a possible failure of the idea.</font>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168681</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>CharlesCS on Your Mortgage is not My Problem.</title></item><item><author>terpfan1980</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>I've had a few potential employers and job sites&nbsp;that were more worried about the stupid stuff than hiring the best they could for the job (me).&nbsp; Clean desk policies that were just insane, appearance issues (I'm not a 'long haired freaky people', so had no idea why someone would have issues with me while they had accepted help from a co-worker with several piercings and and a much more 'punk' appearance but then complained about me), sheep skins and pedigrees, and other things like that.&nbsp; For the most part I've been pretty lucky about where I have worked and I've loved every minute of the jobs that I've had because of the acceptance that I get and normally the appreciation that I get for the job I do.</P>
<P>I'm the hardest workin' sum-beach you'd ever find in just about any job you give me, but of course you have to take the chance and give me the job to find that out (unless of course you call around and check my references and then you wonder how much I paid them to get them to speak so highly of me).</P>
<P>I would certainly have passed on the offer from the Financial firm mentioned here.&nbsp; GoDaddy.com would have been intriquing and I might have walked for that were I you Greywar, but in the end, I've done the same that you have and stuck at some jobs a lot longer and remained more loyal much longer than maybe I should have.&nbsp; Last time I really had the opportunity to take a counter offer and stay I didn't, but it was really all about future opportunities at that point, rather than not liking the job I had. </P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>terpfan1980 on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>MasonM</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[The idea that a company would actually care about the hair and or beard of a tech person is absurd. I can see it if that person were expected to deal with customers, but otherwise it's just an anal power trip on their part. I wouldn't work for them.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>MasonM on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>Locamama</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[I think as long as you were clean and neat, your choice of hairstyle or facial hair shouldn't be an issue.&nbsp; ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>Locamama on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item><item><author>KarmaGirl</author><comments>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>Hehe- GoDaddy sounds a lot like Stardock.&nbsp; We have a couple dress code rules- you have to be dressed, and you have to have something on your feet.&nbsp; We also prefer that people bathe since stinky people are bad.&nbsp; </P>
<P>However, we did have an employee that left here and went to a big company.&nbsp; He went from having long hair and a crazy beard to clean shaven and short hair.&nbsp; Just didn't seem right.</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</guid><link>http://greywar.joeuser.com/article/168769</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:36:08 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-09T10:36:08</pubDateParsed><title>KarmaGirl on Is Your Network Engineer's Hair Important?</title></item></channel></rss>